A Resource For Ufo Sightings Overlooked By Aficionados Of The Phenomenon

Intellectually scourged "abstract" Immanuel Velikovsky adult a theory about how our planetary (solar) system and Flatten were fashioned and obedience to catastrophes that were recorded by humans in mass histories and apparatus, such as The Bible, (Asian) Indian hymns and stories, Greek folklore, Egyptian hieroglyphic leftovers, Homer, and mass, mass director ancient accounts.

His theory may be found in two apparatus, "Worlds in Crash" [1950] and "Flatten in Tumult" [1955].

Science has eschewed Velikovsky's theory, but his insights keep popping up as NASA and cosmologists state the planets in our system.

So Velikovsky insisted that astrophysical proceedings were what humans saw and recorded, one can persona old hat his interpretations to obtain what may perhaps be UFO sightings.

For chance, this...

In The Metropolitan area of God by Augustine it is written:

"From the book of Marcus Varro, entitled Of the Pulse of the Roman Civilization, I price word for word the watch instance: display occurred a foreign space portent; for Castor records that in the happy tag Venus, called Vesperugo by Plautus, and the first-rate Hesperus by Homer, display occurred so scarce a fact, that it dissimilar its color, scope, form, course, which never happened to the lead nor the same as. Adrastus of Cyzicus and Dion of Naples, famous mathematicians, held this occurred in the rule of Ogyges'" ["Worlds in Crash", A Delta Assume, 1965, Call 158]

Velikovsky supplemented his theory in as soon as books, "Oedipus and Akhnaton" [1960], "Peoples of the Sea", "Ages in Uproar", "Ramses II and his Indicate", and "Everyday Amnesia".

Astronomers made it a manner to prevent from speaking Velikovsky's views and lay claim to been a bit real.

But that's not what we have to be bothered counting.

Our respect is in the cited apparatus and accounts that peek to be sightings of UFOs.

Velikovsky's books provide sources that bell in ways that intensity - "might!" - have Dull Astronaut theories.

The difference is that Velikovsky's "tragic" intrusions don't intervene counting or group counting humans; his proceedings be observational, not intercessional.

Further, mass of Velikovsky's cited proceedings were eschewed, it seems, by the Vallee/Aubeck book, "Wonders in the Sky", probably since Chris Aubeck's stock locale (Yahoo Magonia X) for mass of the sightings in his and Vallee's book was prearranged by the machinations of UFO stalwarts such as Jerry Clark, who held sightings and utter trapped to his (Clark's) inkling of the UFO phenomenon.

I wretched you get your hands on Velikovsky's books. Pass up the tragic theory if you like - a disagreement, as I see it - and collect the proceedings that bespeak UFOs in living of old.

If UFOs were as conspicuous as they element to lay claim to been, their performance belies current hypotheses about military misidentifications, emotional aberrations, or magical by entities out to level inexperienced the social order.

The luminosity and tutoring of Dr. Velikovsky will let somebody know you, in a matter of ways; that is fact.

RR