COULD OUR MOON BE ARTIFICIAL AND HOLLOW?2006 01 05"Source: Rediceceations.com"It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the Moon is not what it appears; that it is not just another satellite orbiting a planet, Earth, but an entity which has thrown the minds of some of the greatest thinkers and scientific brains into a quandary and bewilderment unprecedented in the history of astronomy. Why haven't you heard about this? Another government cover-up? How could Moon mysteries have anything to do with government secrecy, and moreover could it relate to the suppression of the space programme? Let us outline some of the extraordinary anomalies and mysteries surrounding this puzzle. Clearly not all data will be equally reliable but the abundance of interrelated information nevertheless gives an overall picture which can be determined with some certainty. The first academic enigma must surely be that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size. However, this would presumably be based on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with 5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow. The eminent scientist Carl Sagan, a typical sceptic, made the statement, 'A natural satellite cannot be a hollow ob-ject'. But meaning here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite and therefore artificial.Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow ob-ject' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. The same effect occurred with Apollo 13's third stage which caused the Moon to ring for over three hours. So what's going on with the Moon? Two Soviet scientists, Vasin and Shcherbokov, have spent much of their careers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their conclusion is that the Moon is artificial, possibly a hollowed-out planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of the galaxy into a circular orbit around our planet (hence the extraordinary mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations). They claim that intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons. In 1968 as Apollo 8 moved into orbit around the Moon, the astronauts spotted a colossal extraterrestrial ob-ject, which then had disappeared on the next orbit. Photographs were taken, of course, but not released to the public. On another occasion when the lunar excursion module was down to 4-5 miles from the Moon's surface astronauts witnessed a UFO suddenly rise from a crater and rapidly disappear. In 1969 Aldrin was checking the lunar surface from orbit, when two UFOs appeared, moved towards the Apollo rocket, hovered nearby, then to Aldrin's utter astonishment the UFOs joined to form one entity. Furthermore, astronauts of Apollo 11 saw a spacefleet of UFOs lined up in a crater. Almost every Moon mission involved encounters with UFOs or UFO sightings, not to mention the discovery of many bases on the Moon's surface. Renowned astronomer Patrick Moore discovered over one hundred dome-like buildings. In fact, about one thousand such bases, dome-like structures of diameter around 700 feet, have been witnessed. Astronomy records extending back 200 years indicate no such artifacts until about the 1950s (remember the book Alternative III?). Many of the UFO encounters by the astronauts were stated to be of a positive nature in which unintrusive assistance was given. It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick mostly metal. Note that mascons (higher concentrations of mass) found in the marias cause fluctuations in gravity and have never been satisfactorily explained. Moreover, these structural anomalies were supported by two publications, one Time Magazine, which unwittingly revealed the gravity value of the Moon relative to Earth by publishing the distance from Earth to Moon of the null point between them, indicating a gravitational force some 60 -70 % of Earth. Furthermore, some people noticed the feeble plumage of the rocket exhaust as the module rose from the Moon's surface explained away by NASA as due to the vacuum. But what about some of the telltale and suspicious features observed during the first Armstrong and Aldrin Moon landing. The American flag was seen briefly to wave in... a breeze? But we are told there is no air on the Moon. The flag was then starched. Also we saw dust kicked up by the astronauts clearly drifting in... what? Dust particles do not drift in vacuum they cling together. And what about the feeble leaps of the astronauts off the Moon's surface were their spacesuits and backpacks really so heavy? The Moon is supposed to be about one-sixth the gravity of Earth. Thus we now know that air is present, and the feeble rocket exhaust could not be due to a vacuum. Moreover, the exhaust was apparently too weak to account for the necessary power to escape from such a gravitational pull in relationship to the size of the module, which was not large enough to contain the necessary fuel to escape the Moon's high gravity. Was antigravity propulsion secretly being used as a booster? The covert government have long since sent 'astronauts' into outer space in antigravity spacecrafts. They apparently had the so-called cosmospheres about 40 years ago, some larger than the old and massive dirigibles. They seized the antigravity research data from the Nazis, and have since then reverse-engineered captured spacecrafts and negotiated deals with aliens involving antigravity technologies. The more thorough have been the investigations of the Moon the more bizarre the results have been. Probably one of the most startling was that moonquakes occurred like clockwork. Moreover, the fluctuations on each occasion were the same. This is impossible for natural conditions which always obey fractal distributions. Furthermore, a study of rock samples reveal an age of 5.3 billion years, and that not only is the Moon older than the Earth, estimated to be about 4.6 billion years, but that it is older than the solar system (and by theoretical standards as old as the universe). What about the surface of the Moon? Several television viewers wrote explaining that they spotted one of the astronauts pick up what appeared to be a glass bottle and remark, 'My God, I don't believe it, look at this... ' Then the television screen went blank. Other viewers observed the extreme difficulty astronauts had when drilling down a few inches into the Moon's marias and that when the drill bit was pulled out, metal shavings were visible. Rocks were found to contain brass, mica, titanium, and elements uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 not previously found in nature. Astronomy literature reports the sighting of a 12-mile bridge-like structure over the Sea of Crisis in 1954 by John O'Neile, and in the 1950s astronomer Jessup realised that UFOs had bases on the Moon (and so does the government of course). Other strange lunar phenomena are: the observation by Dr. Frank Harris of a black body on the surface, 250 miles long and 50 miles wide; clouds and lightning; strange moving shadows and ob-jects, and spire-like structures thousands of feet high; a huge boulder with tracks (behind it) from inside a crater to the rim (uphill); the shrinking, over a period of time, of the crater Luna from six miles in diameter to one and a half miles; 'hill' effects in craters appearing and disappearing in a few hours; over 800 substantial observations made by scientists of blinking and flaashing lights; the results of NASA photographs of the lunar surface, indicating several large pyramid structures, strange rifts in the surface with entrances, massive girders, machinery and some 1000 kilometre blocks of metal, tears in the surface, revealing massive interior 'plumbing', huge crosses a mile long, and enormous excavating equipment. Professional astronomers have gradually been discouraged from investigating these observations, referred to as Transient Lunar Phenomena, and all such Fortean observations are now only of interest to the amateur. Our satellite has long since been established as being extremely dry but this information has been contradicted by the appearance of clouds on the surface. On one occasion a cloud of water vapour appeared covering more than 100 square miles. And it has been reported that strange clouds appear at lightning speed. The capture theory that the Moon was pulled into its orbit by the Earth was once favoured but the circular orbit of the Moon invalidated it. As already mentioned the Moon is the wrong size and in the wrong orbit. It is too big and too far out. It does not rotate relative to Earth; the same side always faces the Earth. And what about the amazing 'coincidence' of the eclipse phenomenon. The position and size of the Moon is precisely that necessary to eclipse the Sun's disc. Scientific experts, including NASA investigators believe that the Moon is hollow it is the only explanation. The velocity of sound has been found to increase with depth and at 40 miles it is too fast for the speed of propagation through rock substance. 'Spaceship Moon' is the brainchild of the two Soviet researchers but many others agree with the theory, including NASA scientists at JPL and an Oxford University physicist. The capture theory is now back in favour but with a significant adjustment that the Moon was steered into orbit. It might be worth a comment on the recent 'conspiracy theory' that astronauts never actually went to the Moon. DVDs and television programmes have proffered that, in particular, photographs allegedly taken on the Moon were faked. In fact one can see clearly in the photographs that the shadows of ob-jects on the Moon were not parallel as they would be if the shadows were cast by the Sun, rather than by studio lighting. Further evidence has been given. But we may know from earlier suspicions that NASA has a propensity for faking scenes for example, the view of the interior of the shuttle faking an outer-space mission when actually on the ground. Thus the conclusion, and personal opinion of the author, is that both scenarios are correct: astronauts did land on the Moon, and NASA has produced faked photographs. Was the space programme cut because further encounters with UFOs might blow the government cover-up? Even more important than this, allowing the public to increase their confront and interest in the subject of extraterrestrials would eventually lead to a worldwide awakening of the human race's true heritage, the causes of our downfall, the falsification of our history, and ultimately the disclosure and eradication of the control mechanism. We see that the Moon mysteries are intimately bound up with extraterrestrial sightings and involvement, in particular, the conclusion of the two Russian scientists that the Moon is artificial and hollow. Is this a favourable omen for the human race or a harbinger of something more ominous. Why was the Moon directed to retain continuously a dark side? A side of the Moon we never see. Also police records referring to increased crime during the full Moon are commonplace. A study of ET material of which literature today abounds, strongly indicates that the nature of the Moon has a sinister purpose and plays a role in manipulating man's evolution. In fact, if we include relevant data from extraterrestrial material transmitted by Ashayana Deane (see other articles for more information on this source) taken from a now vast body of advanced scientific knowledge about the universe, life and man's downfall, it is made clear that the Moon is another of the many components of the Beast machine (see Cosmic Map article), and does indeed play a sinister role. The natural matter of the Moon came from a very large planet, Maldek (or Marduk), which orbited our Sun thousands of years ago between Mars and Jupiter. It was inhabited by a thriving civilisation which degenerated to such a degree that the planet was destroyed. The asteroid belt is a product of the many fragments; also Wormwood (Bible), referred to as Battlestar Wormwood by ETs (see Planet X article). We can tentatively assume now that the Moon consists of a metallic framework which has been packed by pieces from Maldek, forming the spherical shape but is essentially hollow. Similarly for Wormwood. Thus the Moon contains energies and coding (frequency patterns) supporting the original ET agenda for assimilation of our planetary system and in fact the whole time matrix. Further programmes emanate from the moon, such as one to cause unnatural hormonal/menstrual cycles in women to produce more children thus losing control over when to have children. The purpose being to keep a plentiful stock of DNA for their genetic experiments (the human DNA, that is, its original template is valuable to these spiritually-fallen ETs). In fact, not only does the Moon affect the tides of Earth but the blood in living organisms. A separate source of information (channelling) refers to the Moon as being an electromagnetic computer which can be programmed intelligently, such as to influence the feminine cycle (as also mentioned above in the Deane material), and has been transmitting signals to maintain our DNA for aeons.
Gennady Rajkunow, head of the Of great magnitude Switch on of Preset Activity, a consort Roskosmosu (the Russian space agency), introduced the attractive theory according to all go out with the moon moves on view from Rest about 4 cm. In the midst of 100 thousand go out with the split-up is about 40 km. Is it satisfactory to "jumped up" from the Earth's abstemiousness tethers and render an self-ruled planet? Is the Rest as a result becomes a wilderness planet? Since about the scientists?
At the commencing of its history, the Moon was a great deal earlier to the Rest - novel studies assess this split-up to 250 thousand. km. The earth shook as a result a great deal nearer than today.
The moon is aloof in area on the subject of the Rest as a retort of the interaction concerning two forces: abstemiousness and centrifugal force. And these two martial are in square. But its import is the Earth-Moon system, which must be undeniable. But Moon is potent on view from Rest. Why is this happening? 75% of the Earth's departing is layered by water, which is attracted by the abstemiousness of the moon that causes tides. Tidal gravitational martial, resistant by the phenomena up in Earth's mass, "improve" them, kind them the shape of an ellipse. As a result shaped two "bulges" - areas of high sea slick - on each sides of the Earth: coating the moon and the matching, a family in seats honest to them. These "deformations" orbiting Rest in a rapid speech rebel and background of the moon, in the same way as being-drawn by the circle of the Rest, consequential in a fresh leading of the Moon. Exquisite the deformation of the Rest next of kin to the Moon "accelerates" signify of the moon, and Earth's circle slows down, so the Earth's day is extended over the centuries about two thousandths of a diminutive (this is the primarily reason for extra time the day). "Swiftness" orbital signify of the Moon makes its area radius increases by 3.8 cm per go out with and the moon is potent on view from Rest.
Is the moon can move on view from the Rest so that the "break in the middle of the leash?" Near is no legitimacy that phenomenon of the moon moves on view from the Rest to direct in the imminent. A selection of scientists seat that the "dribble" of the moon may be in receipt of slower, and sometimes this happen can be overturned and the moon begins to specialty the Rest.
According to Vladimir Surdin,an administer of the Switch on of Astronomy University circles of Moscow for about 5 billion days the Moon's area reaches its premier percentage - 463.000 km and extend the distribution time of the Rest by the Moon to 870 hours.
Sergei Popov, a scientist from the exceedingly Switch on for Astronomy, held that potent on view from the Moon Earthphenomenon is very lazy. To the get hold of that inside a few billion days the Moon's area attitude emboss by up to 150 percent (next of kin to highlight). Not leave-taking to sequence any pompous, to the same extent the moon can not wholly self-ruled from the Rest, to the same extent "put on is no energy to dribble."
Rajkunow anyway believes that the Rest might face a approximating hazard as Venus, the moon, according to this scientist, was kiedy'sMerkury. As soon as the Mercury "fugitive", Venus, however it is approximating to Rest, has lost the backdrop crucial to state life. But put on is no evidence that Mercury was as soon as a moon of Venus.
Rajkunow`s social group row in the middle of this bill. Bazilevsky Alexander - Manager of the Laboratory of Relation planetary science at the Switch on of Geochemistry and Inquisitive Chemistry, Russian Academia of Sciences - held that put on are one calculations that would show such a prospects, but put on is no evidence this guess. He broaden that "the scheme of the Rest and Venus did not go the exceedingly way as the Venus impression is enriched in the middle of a chunky isotope of hydrogen - deuterium." Each, put on is no legitimacy that in the ahead existed on the departing of Venus mix water, and not objective as steam in the advanced impression, as is the case now.
Can we limp our moon?lunar truth
moon landing
Alien
aliens
nibiru
end of the world
doomsday
judgement day
On July 16th, 1969 Apollo 11 embarked on its historical mission to put a man on the Moon. But what was the true purpose of this mission and did it have a secret agenda? Stunning evidence from declassified "black box" transcriptions lend credibility to the possibility that NASA's mission generally, and the Apollo missions particularly, were organized to covertly document proof of the existence of ancient aliens.For decades, controversy has surrounded the reason why Moltke Crater was the selected landing zone for the first human landing on the Moon. Do the statements of astronauts themselves and peculiar pyramidal structures and triangular roads filmed by Apollo spacecraft indicate evidence of an ancient alien civilization near Moltke Crater? If so, has this evidence been "covered up" pursuant to the Brookings Report's policy recommendations? Footage includes a UFO sighting from Apollo 11's telescopic camera during the flight to the Moon, pyramids and other structures on the Moon and Mars, the Black Knight Satellite encounter, and more. Is it possible that NASA has known for years that extraterrestrials do in fact exist, and is this evidence blatantly available in declassified and public archive records? And just who exactly are "the people that live in the Moon?"
Source: ufos-and-aliens.blogspot.com
In the year 1960, John F. Kennedy won the presidential seat after he campaigned for space exploration and missile defense in order for America to gain superiority over the Soviet Union. And so with that came the funding and realization of an American spaceflight called APOLLO (named after the mythological Greek of intellectual pursuits) that landed the first man on the moon. It was by far the most famous program in the history of America, if not the history of the world.
The American president that preceded Kennedy, President Eisenhower, was opposed to the whole space exploration mission. He did not see this extravagant stunt as a way for Americans to surpass the Russians. He termed this as the lunar space race. There were two main factors that initiated this race to the moon. The first factor was the capability of Communist Russia to achieve a lunar landing. President Kennedy did not want the United States to lag behind Russia especially when the competition has already achieved its first orbital flight that encircled the earth. The second factor was the belief of a missile gap between the two countries. The communist Soviets clearly have an advantage in space rocketry over the democratic Americans and this prompted a struggle between the two on which of them will reign supreme. The idea that a missile gap existed brought fear to Kennedy and what could happen to the United States if it were to lose the Cold War.
The Apollo space program had but one goal-for Americans reach the moon first. After several space crafts and failed missions, man successfully stepped on the moon. It was the first time in history that a human being landed on an extraterrestrial mass. On July 20, 1969, on board Apollo 11, Neil Armstrong became the first man to land on the moon. Eleven other astronauts came after that. The United States landing on the moon ended the lunar race with the Soviets. The American success, as Logsdon noted, "Tarnished the image of socialist competence and diminished Soviet standing in world affairs".
At present, the United States and the People's Republic of Russia are working together on space explorations rather than as competitors.
APOLLO SPACE PROGRAM TRIBUTE
Credit: anomalies-in-backyard.blogspot.com
