Again Why Cave Art And Did Other Worldly Agents Bring It About

Again Why Cave Art And Did Other Worldly Agents Bring It About
COPYRIGHT 2012, INTERAMERICA, INC.

SECRETS OF THE ICE AGE: THE Construction OF THE Cave ARTISTS by Evan Hadingham [Backpacker and Grouping, NY, 1979], pictured top-quality, makes clear that no one knows, for sure, why prime mankind painted on cavern stockade or twisted gem art.

And firm cavern art is not representational such as this accept resemblance from "Abri Leuillet" in the Paris Pool, dating from the Neolithic period:

"Subject 285"

Mr. Hardingham presents the mystery of why art seems to yield waned after the Ice Age:

"Subject 267"

The create that cavern art was totemic in style, or bent for paranormal rituals is improper, writes Mr. Hadingham.

Of course, present-day are firm totemic drawings, just as present-day depictions of a sexual style or hunting scenes.

And the create that such art stemmed from a pursuit, art-for-arts sake has been inferior exceedingly.

Why do I convene in presenting the cavern art scenarios here?

I intricate that everything happened that encouraged the prime or original act upon, as was the case on Easter Island; that is, either paranormal, extraterrestrial, or weird (an intrusion by idol) agents instigated or sparked such art, maybe by just being extant.

And UFOs or other-worldly beings played a controlling factor in this esthetic pay in by new mankind, which used up for a because to show up at the shrink of the Sumerian/Egyptian cultural beginnings.

But if "slight" agents brought on the originality, why didn't it stay in an blatant form?

Likewise, present-day is no and has been no blatant esthetic thrusts or evidence of such artistic events by dwell in beings encountered in UFO goings-on of the protester era.

Beings imagined or real, encountered by humans, yield been distinctive in their unesthetic contact.

Was the artistic cinder lit long ago and gone to geminate on its own?

Did the gods or ET pervade globe in the manner of an artistic DNA constraint and next let it rot on its own, and if so, why?

Or is an slight evocative needed at all?

What caused new man (and protester man) to draw (or paint)?

Do we swallow an slight deposit as an explanation?

Even the From the past Astronaut theorists are loath to wax enthusiastically about aliens inculcating art among their processes for humanity's "strut," sonorous the rumored prime scientific and/or architectural input.

But there's spread participating in....everything not more accurately world power, about new mankind's cutting edge path to resemblance pictograms such as inscription and vernacular were insufficiently mechanized,

And is present-day a UFO tie-in?

RR


0 comments:

Post a Comment