COPYRIGHT 2013, INTERAMERICA, INC.
"In MAKING CONTACT: A SERIOUS HANDBOOK FOR LOCATING AND COMMUNICATING WITH EXTRATERRESTRIALS, edited by Bill Fawcett [William Morrow and Company, Inc.,NY, 1997] A chapter entitled Alien First Aid" by Mickey Zucker Reichert, M.D. begins with this blurb [Page 316]:
"ONE OF THE MOST COMPELLING IMAGES IN THE ROSWELL INCIDENT IS THAT OF A DAZED OR INJURED ALIEN SITTING NEXT TO ONE THAT WAS EVEN MORE SEVERELY HURT...."
The chapter's text begins:
"Believers in the Roswell Incident maintain that two injured humanoid creatures were discovered at the site, one in shock, the other unconscious and leaking fluid that appeared to be blood."
Doctor Reichert continues for several pages to discuss the practice of medicine, how to handle accident victims, and bleeding, among other medicinal issues.
One Page 321 is this:
"Because of the Roswell descriptions, I'd like to say a few things about shock..."
"The unconscious, bleeding alien described by the Roswell Incident advocates would almost certainly also be "in shock."... The other alien, if not also bleeding, likely suffered from obstructive shock."
Dr. Reichert leaves the Roswell story, with this:
"Let's run through one possible scenario, assuming the ALLEGED crash at Roswell occurred in your own backyard. "[Page 322] (I like that he used the word "alleged".)
She doesn't return to the Roswell "facts" enumerated above, but continues to delineate how "Ruth and John" handle CPR and the crash victims that landed in their yard.
Now I ask, where did Dr. Reichart get his "two alien victims" story?
Who said one alien was bleeding? And one was in shock?
The Reichert "information" might come in handy when Kevin Randle's Roswell Dream Team produces, if it ever does, its discovery of new Roswell evidence.
(By the way, Kevin Randle has a chapter in this book, about Roswell, of course.)
RR
By Jeffrey KlugerCharge11-17-14 "Parcel THEORIES NEVER DIE, BUT THAT DOESNT Connote WE Party line GET SMARTER Just about Dealing Afterward THEM" You've surefire heard the thrilling news that the European Void Agency jubilantly landed a insignificant spacecraft on the emerge of Comet 67P-or possibly we prerequisite say "Comet 67P." Since what you doubtless haven't heard is that the seeming comet is in actual fact a spacecraft, that it has a transmitting tower and other replication structures on its emerge, and that the short-lived was in actual fact launched to reaction to a radio long-awaited from aliens that NASA established 20 existence ago.... Be responsible for Survey... See Also:Rosetta Charge Comet is Funny craft? Funny Artifacts On The Moon? "NASA Hardened Clark C. McClelland Confirms Funny Living as Outlined by Astronaut Edgar Mitchell!"NASA Scientist Claims Proof of Funny Fabrication on Meteorite Link up YOUR UFO ProficiencyTake higher >>
Source: alienspress.blogspot.com
Marden's site: KathleenMardenUFO results of study here. Kathleen Marden is Betty Hill's niece and co-author, with Stanton Friedman, of Captured! The Betty and Barney Hill UFO Experience. I was fortuante enough to see both Friedman and Marden speak at the McMinnville UFO Festival a couple of years ago. (I even was lucky enough to interview Mr. Friedman. Who, I'm sure, thought I was a bit of a ditz, since I was old school and used only a notebook; no tape, recorder, etc. just me and my pen. But he was extremely polite and too much a gentleman and professional to let on.)
"Nearly a year ago, Denise Stoner and I met to discuss the commonalities that alien abduction experiencers share. As longtime abduction investigators/researchers, we were aware of certain repeating patterns of information and characteristics. The pertinent literature, the academic social science studies and the works of David Jacobs, PhD, Thomas Bullard, PhD, Yvonne Smith, and the late Budd Hopkins, John Mack, MD, and others had identified several commonalities among abduction experiencers. But we had not been able to locate an academic study that was specific to our particular interests."
I was born in 1954, and so of course found this greatly interesting:
"WE WERE INTERESTED IN IDENTIFYING POSSIBLE TRENDS AMONG AGE GROUPS, PARTLY DUE TO THE FACT THAT A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF ABDUCTION EXPERIENCERS IN THE 50+ AGE GROUP HAD REPORTED THEIR EXPERIENCES TO US WITHIN RECENT MONTHS. OUR INTUITION WAS CORRECT. 44% OF THE AE GROUP PARTICIPANTS WERE BORN IN THE 1950'S, although only 20% of the NAE Group was in the same age group. This figure drops dramatically for those born in the 1940's (18%) and the 1960's (26%)."
The study contributes important data to be sure. What it all means and how it all gets interpreted; that's to be seen of course.
I've never felt I could be honest and participate in studies like this, because the question is always presented with the assumption the respondent "knows" they've been abducted. I don't know any such thing. "However," at least two episodes of missing time connected to UFO sightings, vivid dreams involving aliens and UFOs, a life time of consciously remembered UFO and alien sightings and interactions, karmic, shared, and parallel UFO related experiences regards my spouse, all point to a huge "We have no flippin' idea what abductions are; if they're literal physical events or what, but it does seem awfully and enormously significant, doesn't it?" question.
