Ufo Sighting In Salt Lake City Utah On November 3Rd 2013 Red Object Hovers And Moves Erratically
Labels:
aliens,
encounters,
tv ufo
0
comments
Bigfoot News On Bigfoot Dna
Labels:
aliens,
keyhoe,
phenomenon
0
comments
by Robert Lindsay September 14, 2012. 7:22 PM
BIGFOOT NEWS SEPTEMBER 14, 2012
OLYMPIC PROJECT SUCCESSFUL SUBMISSIONS TO DR. MELBA KETCHUM DNA PROJECT REVEALED. A source has informed me that the Olympic Project submitted ~103 hair samples to Ketchum's project, and ~85 of them tested presumptive to Bigfoot by DNA. Another ~18 Olympic Project hair samples were apparently from either humans or known animals. Those 85 successful submissions represent anywhere from 5-13 separate creatures.
Apparently all of the hair was gathered in the Olympic Peninsula of Washington state. This makes the Olympic Project the largest submitter to the project.
UPDATED LIST OF SUCCESSFUL SAMPLES TO KETCHUM PROJECT. Here it is:
RUNDOWN OF SAMPLES IN THE KETCHUM STUDY. "This will be updated every time it changes."
Bigfoot samples submitted: Over 200
Presumptive for Bigfoot: Almost 100
# of Bigfoot individuals represented: 20-28
"Details of successful Bigfoot samples:"
5 HAIR SAMPLES from Golden Ears Provincial Park in British Columbia representing 3 separate creatures - a male, a female and a juvenile from a family unit who were observed together prior to collecting the samples - gathered in 2010 by Randy Brisson of the Erickson Project.
1 TOENAIL from Larry Jenkins in the Grand Canyon area of Arizona.
1 BLOOD SAMPLE from JC Johnson in the Four Corners area of New Mexico (skunk in a drainpipe sample).
1 BLOOD AND TISSUE SAMPLE of a female Bigfoot representing either "Matilda" or her mother from Crittenden, Kentucky, gathered by the Dennis Pfohl and Leila Hadj-Chikh of the Erickson Project. Sample was obtained by gluing glass shards on a feeding plate.
1 HAIR SAMPLE from David Paulides' NABS known as the Ulibarri sample from Hoopa Valley, California.
1 HAIR SAMPLE from Larry Surface in Southern Ohio. Surface shot the controversial nighttime Bigfoot video that was pulled from the web a while back.
1 HAIR SAMPLE (possible Dogman) from Joe Black in the Great Smoky Mountains, Eastern Tennessee.
1 TISSUE (FLESH INCLUDING MUSCLE AND FAT) SAMPLE in the form of a slice of Bigfoot flesh from Mount Haskell, California from the adult male Bigfoot shot dead on October 10, 2010 by Justin Smeja in the Sierra Kills incident.
1 LARGE SAMPLE OF SALIVA from the Olympic Peninsula, Washington, collected by the Olympic Project obtained via a Bigfoot licking a trail camera.
1 HAIR SAMPLE from SE Oklahoma collected by TEXLA Cryptozoological Research.
1 BLOOD, TISSUE AND HAIR SAMPLE from a nailboard trap at Snelgrove Lake, Ontario, Canada (presumably successful).
~85 HAIR SAMPLES from the Olympic Peninsula, Washington, collected by the Olympic Project representing 5-13 separate individuals.
That is apparently all or nearly all of the nearly 100 successful Bigfoot samples. The other 100 samples are all apparently from either humans or known animals.
Best Bigfoot samples: Smeja's Bigfoot steak and JC Johnson's skunk in a drainpipe Bigfoot blood sample.
WHO BAILED OUT ADRIAN ERICKSON? Last fall, Erickson was in deep doodoo financially. He was working 6 days a week, 12 hours a day trying to keep his real estate business above water. He was being sued by several parties, including the buyers of his homes. He was under a lot of physical and psychological toll - basically a stress case. His numerous investors were getting upset.
Erickson built a large real estate development in British Columbia called Ruby Ridge. He sold a number of lots but then became underwater with the US recession caused by radical neoliberal capitalism's unregulated banking sector and massive bankster fraud. This neoliberalism-generated recession affected the whole world, including Canada. Erickson was having a hard time selling homes due to the downturn in the housing market.
He had promised buyers are variety of amenities for their lots including phone and cell coverage, water, sewage lines and roads. With no more money coming in, he was unable to provide these amenities. Through no fault of Erickson's, his lot buyers were left holding the bag.
He also spent 3 million on his Bigfoot project, the Erickson Project, with no results to show for it yet.
Things looked grim. The prospect of bankruptcy for the business and foreclosure on Erickson's very nice home loomed.
I'm not divulging too much personal information here as most of this has already been reported in the British Columbia press.
Here it is, 9 months later, and everything has changed. Early in the year, Erickson apparently took his Bigfoot documentary to Hollywood where it was worked on with post-production editing. In the interim, Erickson's financial problems seem to have evaporated or at least gotten much better. The word we have is that financially, things are going quite well.
This does not make sense. The housing market in BC has not returned since last fall, so he's not selling anymore homes than he was then. How did he get the money to send the doc to Hollywood to have it worked on? It makes no sense, because at the time it was down there, Erickson was flat broke. How did he get the huge amount of money needed to bail him out of the financial hole? He could not have made it selling lots. Someone must have bailed him out in some way.
Erickson is now happy and calm and is no longer working all the time. He is back guiding hunts and again, and he's going to Africa soon to hunt. He seems relaxed about the subject of Bigfoot and acts like it is out of his hands and his life.
Whereas previously for a long time, he got angry anytime anyone brought up the subject. On numerous occasions, Erickson said he didn't want to hear the word Bigfoot ever again. Furthermore, Erickson and Ketchum, who never got along, have now mysteriously become BFF's.
Logically, none of this makes any sense. The only way this could have happened is that an unknown person or persons with a lot of money stepped in and got Erickson out of his hole by sending a lot of money his way, either via gift or investment.
I suspected that Wally Hersom gave Erickson the cash to get him out of the hole he was in and to send the documentary down to Hollywood.
However, when I asked around, a source close to Hersom emphatically told me that he strongly doubted that Hersom had either bailed Erickson out or even given him the money to take his doc to Hollywood to have it worked on.
There is suspicion that Ketchum is now the owner of Erickson's footage, but it has been impossible to confirm. However, it does remain a hunch of mine for reasons I cannot divulge.
The events surrounding Erickson and his movie in the last 9 months remain shrouded in mystery.
PHOTOS AND VIDEO OF BIGFOOTS EXIST THAT ARE BETTER THAN THE PATTERSON FOOTAGE. Photos and video have been shot in the past 20 years that are said to be better than the Patterson footage. They are better than the Patterson footage in that it is clearer. At least a couple of them were shot in the Pacific Northwest.
A source who has seen the footage says that there is no way it could have been hoaxed. In both cases, the persons who own the footage refuse to release it because of the Hellish notoriety of publicity that cascades down on anyone who releases purported Bigfoot footage. The crucifixion of Melissa Hovey over her photo is a good recent example.
--BY MY CLASSIFICATION, NEARLY ALL "OTHER" SAMPLES EXCLUDING THE OLYMPIC HAIR AND SALIVA SAMPLE, AND THE BC HAIR SAMPLES-POSSIBLY ALSO OTHER SAMPLES FROM CALIFORNIA OTHER THAN THE SMEJA "SIERRA KILLS" SAMPLES-ALL BELONG TO THE EASTERN AS VS. THE WESTERN BIGFOOT AND SHOULD TEST OUT AS MORE HUMAN OVERALL. THE BUZZ IS ALSO THAT THE SUSPECTED "DOGMAN" DOES NOT MATCH THE REST. I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE TEST RESULTS OF ANY OF THIS OTHER THAN WHAT HAS PREVIOUSL BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED PUBLICALLY. I HAVE HEARD AND I AM PRETTY SURE THE SIERRA KILLS DNA DOES NOT MATCH THE OLYMPIC HAIR DNA. THE WORD I HAVE FROM PRIOR TESTS IS THAT THE WESTERN SASQUATCH DNA FALLS INTO THE SAME LARGER CATEGORY AS THE MODERN APES AND HUMANS BUT DOES NOT MATCH ANY OF THEM SPECIFICALLY, AND IT DOES NOT MATCH THE "YETI" OR ORANG PENDEK" HAIR DNA WHICH IS MORE SPECIFICALLY LIKE ORANGUTAN DNA [AND SO FAR HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO BE A DIFFERENT SPECIES FROM THE ORANGUTAN]. THE EASTERN BIGFOOT SAMPLES ALWAYS FALL INTO THE SAME GENERAL RANGE OF ALMOST-HUMAN AS THE NEANDERTHAL DNA ALSO FALLS INTO GENERALLY. THIS WAS MY UNDERSTANDING ON THE MATTER FROM BEFORE ANY MENTION OF THE ERICKSON PROJECT. I AM STILL AS INTERESTED AS ANYONE ELSE TO SEE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY, ONLY IN MY CASE I HAD INDEPENDANTLY ALREADY HEARD OF OTHER BIGFOOT DNA TEST RESULTS FROM BEFOREHAND.
-- BEST WISHES, DALE D.
My Ufo Workload
Labels:
aliens,
ufo station,
ufos in paintings
0
comments
Anyway, to demonstrate my effectiveness, I turned in a case report just today, and I used the new case reporting form for the first time. A few weeks ago MUFON HQ in Cincinatti was threatening excommunication for anyone who failed to use this new reporting form, and now that I've used it I don't see what the fuss is about. See, to begin with I totally forgot about using the new form and filed my report on the old form... Then I got Vxxxx's email with her reminder to use the new form or else, and I quickly filled in the new form and snuck it in as an attachment to the old form. The thing is, there's not a whole lot of difference between the two.
But in case you ever wondered what an official Certified UFO Field Investigation case report looks like, here you go:
MUFON CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INVESTIGATOR - Mark O'Connell ID # 18761
CASE NUMBER - 42930
BALLESTER-GUASP RESULTS - TOTAL CERTAINTY INDEX IS - 0
LATITUDE LONGITUDE - 44.4683430000/-88.1045645000
SYNOPSIS - Night sighting: Witness saw two white luminous oblong objects descend from sky and disappear behind a building
OBJECT DESCRIPTION - White, luminous, oblong, about twice the size of a car.
EVIDENCE - None
WEATHER INFORMATION - Clean, starry sky, no wind
WITNESS CREDIBILITY - Moderate; he could not be sure he was describing the objects accurately, but he was eager to know if anyone else had seen the same objects that night.
WITNESS INTERVIEW AND STATEMENTS - Witness was driving to work at 11:50 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012, in an industrial section of Green Bay. There was no traffic and the streets had no lighting. He saw a lighted, oblong object in the sky, about 20 degrees above the ground, descending in a straight line towards some industrial buildings. Although he was only a few miles from Austin Straubel airport, he was sure this wasnt a plane; it seemed to move about the same speed as a landing plane, but there were no wings, no sound and no green and red lights. He pulled over and got out of the car to watch as the object disappeared behind a three-story warehouse that was about 300 yards away. He expected the object to reappear on the other side of the building but it never did. Then he saw a second, identical object approaching from the same direction and descending at the same speed and angle. The oblong, glowing object disappeared behind the same warehouse and did not appear on the other side.
He went back the next day to inspect the two fields where he thought the objects might have landed, but he did not find any signs of a landing.
NATURAL PHENOMENON OR MAN MADE - Unknown
CORRELATING CASES - Unknown
" CONCLUSIONS - The witness could not provide enough details to be sure of what he might have seen. Had he investigated the possible landing site at the time of the sighting, he could have gotten much more information, but he had to go to work and wasn't able to follow up until the next day."
Pretty neat and orderly, isn't it? Too bad I had to classify the sighting as "Unknown," but the witness, sincere as he was, just didn't give me much to work with. And as a result, I am submitting my first UFO case report with a Ballaster-Guasp Certainty Evaluation of... ZERO. Do you get it? After all this work, filling the form out twice when I could have been playing solitaire, it turns out that there is absolutely "zero certainty" that this sighting even happened! I'm used to getting 12s and 13s on my cases, and I just got a zero. You have no idea how heartbreaking that is for me...
Reference: ufos-and-aliens.blogspot.com
Enceladus Frozen Ocean And What Phoenix Can Tell Us About The Possibility For Life On Mars
Labels:
aliens,
ufo crashes,
ufocasebook
0
comments
Welcome! "Alien Life" tracks the latest discoveries and thoughts in the various elements of the famous Drake Equation. You may notice that this and future entries are shorter than usual; career, family and book deal commitments have forced me to cut back some of my projects. Now, here's today's news:
g STARS - What is the habitable zone for the nearby Luyten's Star?
g ABODES - Three years ago, surprising evidence came out for an ocean underneath the surface of Saturn's moon Enceladus. But a new report indicates just how hard it may be to keep water from freezing on this tiny moon. See article.
g LIFE - In this interview, William Boynton talks about the TEGA instrument on the Phoenix Lander, and explains what it can tell us about the possibility for life on Mars. See article.
g MESSAGE - Is METI, or "Messaging to Extraterrestrial Intelligence", a viable option? See article.
g LEARNING - Here's a neat classroom activity, courtesy of NASA: "The Drake Equation." Students estimate the number of civilizations in the galaxy by first estimating the number of craters on the Moon and then by performing estimates of multiple-variable systems culminating in the use of the Drake Equation. See article.
g IMAGINING - Psychologist Frederick Malmstrom, currently a visiting scholar at the U.S. Air Force Academy, believes that "visions" of space aliens are actually the image of the prototypical female face that is hardwired into every baby human's brain. When Malmstrom altered a picture of a woman in a way consistent with the characteristics of a newborn's vision (astigmatism and a shallow focal plane), the result looked very much like a big-eyed alien. See article.
g AFTERMATH - As SETI's scientists plan for their first contact with other worlds, who better to consult with than anthropologists, who specialize in encounters with exotic cultures? And thus, over the past several years the SETI Institute has repeatedly brought together anthropologists and scholars from other disciplines, in an attempt to bridge the gap between humans and extraterrestrials. See article.
Get your SF book manuscript edited
g STARS - What is the habitable zone for the nearby Luyten's Star?
g ABODES - Three years ago, surprising evidence came out for an ocean underneath the surface of Saturn's moon Enceladus. But a new report indicates just how hard it may be to keep water from freezing on this tiny moon. See article.
g LIFE - In this interview, William Boynton talks about the TEGA instrument on the Phoenix Lander, and explains what it can tell us about the possibility for life on Mars. See article.
g MESSAGE - Is METI, or "Messaging to Extraterrestrial Intelligence", a viable option? See article.
g LEARNING - Here's a neat classroom activity, courtesy of NASA: "The Drake Equation." Students estimate the number of civilizations in the galaxy by first estimating the number of craters on the Moon and then by performing estimates of multiple-variable systems culminating in the use of the Drake Equation. See article.
g IMAGINING - Psychologist Frederick Malmstrom, currently a visiting scholar at the U.S. Air Force Academy, believes that "visions" of space aliens are actually the image of the prototypical female face that is hardwired into every baby human's brain. When Malmstrom altered a picture of a woman in a way consistent with the characteristics of a newborn's vision (astigmatism and a shallow focal plane), the result looked very much like a big-eyed alien. See article.
g AFTERMATH - As SETI's scientists plan for their first contact with other worlds, who better to consult with than anthropologists, who specialize in encounters with exotic cultures? And thus, over the past several years the SETI Institute has repeatedly brought together anthropologists and scholars from other disciplines, in an attempt to bridge the gap between humans and extraterrestrials. See article.
Get your SF book manuscript edited
Amazon.com Widgets
Apollo Space Program Beginnings
Labels:
aliens,
moons,
planemos
0
comments
The American president that preceded Kennedy, President Eisenhower, was opposed to the whole space exploration mission. He did not see this extravagant stunt as a way for Americans to surpass the Russians. He termed this as the lunar space race. There were two main factors that initiated this race to the moon. The first factor was the capability of Communist Russia to achieve a lunar landing. President Kennedy did not want the United States to lag behind Russia especially when the competition has already achieved its first orbital flight that encircled the earth. The second factor was the belief of a missile gap between the two countries. The communist Soviets clearly have an advantage in space rocketry over the democratic Americans and this prompted a struggle between the two on which of them will reign supreme. The idea that a missile gap existed brought fear to Kennedy and what could happen to the United States if it were to lose the Cold War.
The Apollo space program had but one goal-for Americans reach the moon first. After several space crafts and failed missions, man successfully stepped on the moon. It was the first time in history that a human being landed on an extraterrestrial mass. On July 20, 1969, on board Apollo 11, Neil Armstrong became the first man to land on the moon. Eleven other astronauts came after that. The United States landing on the moon ended the lunar race with the Soviets. The American success, as Logsdon noted, "Tarnished the image of socialist competence and diminished Soviet standing in world affairs".
At present, the United States and the People's Republic of Russia are working together on space explorations rather than as competitors.
APOLLO SPACE PROGRAM TRIBUTE
Credit: anomalies-in-backyard.blogspot.com
Ufo Sightings Daily Ancient Alien Ship Crash Landed On
Labels:
aliens,
disaster accident,
ufo led
0
comments
Ufos Zamora Zamorro Big Foot And
Labels:
aliens,
forteana,
mysteries
0
comments
Snap here and there in to see clipping
Lonnie Zamora saw a UFO taking into account two beings accessible by. Zamorro saw a "saucer" taking into account a Big Alight mind accessible by.
What's our point?
That interpretation of UFOs and other paranormal artifacts (ghosts, sea monsters, fairies, et al.) are basic by synchronous delusions, piebald by the mind-sets of the observers, make-believe a psychological or neurological pair amid witnesses to UFO deeds, as we and Paratopia's Jeff Ritzmann would own up it.
UFOs, after having, sometimes, a conspicuous labor on materiality, the evidence or time-out of that specific conspicuous labor are lost or riotous in the observational aftermath.
UFOs own up remained elusive for millennia. Composed data has provided no conspicuous telltale sign as to what they are.
Ritzmann, among others, consider that UFOs moderate their ghost or appearances to check to the cultural/societal environment at the time they are observed.
That is, UFOs pitch the strict attributes of the classify in which they are seen or witnessed.
No, it's not a matter of annotations by witnesses - such as chariots of explode in the early older records of humanity or the 1890 airships. Suchlike is seen or reported is moral what is seen; the UFO (or flying saucer) manifests itself impartial as witnesses own up reported them.
The "saucers" of the 1950s, the occupant-sightings too, were geared to the way of behaving of the observers.
The zeitgeist determines how UFOs wish express -- their clear construct.
But as the old insightful saw goes - if a tree falls in the forest and no one is physically to hitch it, does it form a sound? - applies: if a UFO is in the locality of humans, but no one is physically to see it, does it seed a conspicuous ghost (for cameras, radar, et cetera)?
It seems that real UFO incidents convoy humans to notice them, put on the right track or long-windedly.
And while humans notice the UFO(s), they do so taking into account all the total emotional detritus that suffuses their mind or involvement.
Is portray a UFO reality that is resolved or uniform? Allegedly not.
UFOs moderate themselves - we're telling a source of revenue award clearly -- or are altered by the emotional configurations of those perceiving them.
Show is no one UFO ghost, no one UFO reality. UFOs are all property to all nation, manifesting their reality dependent upon the emotional make-up of the personality or live in booty in their ghost, in the air, on the ground (as in childhood years, stuck-up so than today), or via technology (radar, for instant).
And those who debris the reality are besides determinant morally. They debris the "reality" or "delusional reality" of others from the time when they are saddled taking into account mind-sets of a preventive propitious.
Until neurology, psychology, sociology, and other disciplines gear the UFO phenomenon concerning the parameters of human emotional vagaries, the mystery wish stretch out elusive.
Hypothesizing about UFOs taking into account an extraterrestrial situation seems a silly formation. The folkloric piece, propounded by Jacques Vallee or Dr. David Clarke, is a fully developed routine.
But one shouldn't turn away from the ET annotations out-of-hand. It artifact a the makings, in the not inconsiderable hypothesis of property, but it shouldn't becloud other interpretations, as it has for the similar to 60 years or so.... The UFO Iconoclast(s)
Origin: unexplored-earth.blogspot.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
